Acta Trade Agreement

A number of countries like India and African nations have a history of researching cheaper generic versions of expensive drugs for infections like HIV, which has often been rejected by pharmaceutical companies. „There are international agreements like the TRIPS agreement that provides for the latter possibility,“ he said. „They are especially important for developing countries that, for example, cannot afford to pay for patented HIV medicines.“ Arif said ACTA would limit the freedom of countries like India to decide their own medical decisions. [110] Monika Ermert, „Anti-ACTA protests are expected to increase in two dozen countries; Parliament Opposition Rises“, Intellectual Property Watch, 8 June 2012, (called 14 October 2012). The United States, Australia, Canada, Korea, Japan, New Zealand, Morocco and Singapore signed the Anti-Counterfeiting Agreement (ACTA) at a ceremony in Tokyo on October 1, 2011, marking an important milestone in the international fight against counterfeiting and copyright piracy. Representatives of the other ACTA parties, the European Union, Mexico and Switzerland, participated in the ceremony and reaffirmed their continued support and preparation for the signing of the agreement as soon as possible. The next step in the entry into force of ACTA is the deposit of instruments of ratification, acceptance or approval by each of the signatories. The Agreement will enter into force after the deposit of the sixth such instrument. On October 1, 2011, eight parties to ACTA signed the unprecedented high-level plurilateral agreement on the enforcement of intellectual property rights. The final text of the Treaty[85] was published on 15 April 2011 and comprises six chapters of 45 articles: at the end of the date set out in Article 39, each WTO member country may attempt to accede to the Agreement. The conditions of adoption are decided on a case-by-case basis. The contract would enter into force thirty days after receipt of its act by the depositary for the successful applicants. As Acta is an international treaty, it is an example of policy laundering used to define and implement legislative changes.

The laundering of policies makes it possible to impose legal provisions through negotiations concluded between the private members of the executive bodies of the signatories. This method avoids the application of public legislation and its judicial oversight. Once ratified, companies that are not members may be required to comply with ACTA requirements, failing which they will fall under safe harbor protection. The use of trade incentives, etc., to convince other nations to adopt treaties, is also a standard approach in international relations. Additional signatories should accept acta`s terms without much room for negotiation. [117] Section 4 of ACTA deals with the criminal enforcement of intellectual property rights, according to Professor Michael Blakeney. The main point of the section (Article 23) focuses on the commercial criminalization of deliberate infringement or piracy of copyright or related rights. The signing of the EU and many of its member states has sparked widespread protests across Europe. The European Parliament`s rapporteur, Kader Arif, has resigned. His successor, British MEP David Martin, recommended that Parliament reject ACTA and said: „The potential benefits of this international agreement will be more than outweighed by potential threats to civil liberties.“ On 4 July 2012, the European Parliament rejected its approval and rejected it by 478 votes to 39, with 165 abstentions. [10] [11] The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) was a multilateral proposal establishing international standards for the enforcement of intellectual property rights. .

. .

This entry was posted in Allgemein.